|
Usability of federated trust management systems is mainly reflected in user
awareness. After a user has deployed a trust management system, operation should be
autonomous unless the system actively requires a user's involvement. These two
aspects are explained in detail. Other factors such as understandability, operability,
user involvement, and user's acceptance will be discussed in the actual
comprehensive comparison of existing systems.
Following the four network management configuration aspects and three important evaluation
perspectives discussed in section 2 and 4, a set of comprehensive evaluation metrics
will be discussed and used to compare the six major trust management systems, and
especially for their support of federation activities. This set of evaluation metrics is
divided into four groups and examined from three evaluation perspectives. After this
comparison, strength and weakness of each system can then be analyzed. And
direction for further improvement of each system can be identified. The evaluation
data are collected from a number of server systems. Each system runs on a Xeon
2.80GHz processor, 512MB memory, and the Windows XP professional version.
|